Boost logo

Boost :

From: Jeff Garland (jeff_at_[hidden])
Date: 2004-01-23 09:45:42

On Fri, 23 Jan 2004 07:36:15 +0000 (UTC), Joaquin M Lopez Munoz wrote
> Jim Apple <japple <at>> writes:
> >
> [snip]
> >
> > Counting only libraries with a "formal review request" (in the words of
> > the authors), I count 7 (fc++, circular_buffer, minmax,
> > aligned_storage.hpp, lexicographic, disable unused variable warnings,
> > Named Params) libraries/utils with no response from the wizard.

According to the CVS version of the review schedule Minmax was reviewed 28 Sep
07 Oct 2002. According to my email archive the request for circular_buffer
was in July of last year and development has continued culminating in a 3.5
version posting in late october.

As for the response from the wizard, it may have been done offlist or not at
all. Personally, I'd like to see a 'Boost review quarterly report' from the
review wizard so we know what the upcoming schedule is and what has been
completed in the last few months.

> And indexed_set :) As for this library of mine, interest
> in the list has been admittedly low, but I haven't gotten any

I don't think I would say that -- I recall a number of lively discussions.
I'm personally quite interested in your library, but I just haven't had time
to look at it...

> clue about what to do after asking the formal review. Even
> receiving a rejection note or something is better than living
> in limbo.

Ask again. And make sure you send the request directly to Thomas. If you
don't hear back then post on the list and I'm sure we can figure it out.


Boost list run by bdawes at, gregod at, cpdaniel at, john at