Re: [boost] Re: Regex Question: Explicit Constructor

From: Beman Dawes (bdawes_at_[hidden])
Date: 2004-01-24 10:13:21

At 08:03 AM 1/24/2004, John Maddock wrote:

 >OK here's my take on this:
 >
 >...
 >
 >At present I do not believe that the case for removing the explicit
 >overways these arguments, but I accept that the issue may be finely
 >balanced, and in large part subjective.

I think your case for explicit construction is reasonable.

If you haven't done so already, you might add your rationale to the docs as 
either rationale or a faq entry.

--Beman