Boost logo

Boost :

From: Beman Dawes (bdawes_at_[hidden])
Date: 2004-01-24 10:13:21

At 08:03 AM 1/24/2004, John Maddock wrote:

>OK here's my take on this:
>At present I do not believe that the case for removing the explicit
>overways these arguments, but I accept that the issue may be finely
>balanced, and in large part subjective.

I think your case for explicit construction is reasonable.

If you haven't done so already, you might add your rationale to the docs as
either rationale or a faq entry.


Boost list run by bdawes at, gregod at, cpdaniel at, john at