From: Beman Dawes (bdawes_at_[hidden])
Date: 2004-01-24 10:13:21
At 08:03 AM 1/24/2004, John Maddock wrote:
>OK here's my take on this:
>At present I do not believe that the case for removing the explicit
>overways these arguments, but I accept that the issue may be finely
>balanced, and in large part subjective.
I think your case for explicit construction is reasonable.
If you haven't done so already, you might add your rationale to the docs as
either rationale or a faq entry.
Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk