From: Beman Dawes (bdawes_at_[hidden])
Date: 2004-01-26 11:28:44
At 10:33 AM 1/26/2004, David Abrahams wrote:
>John Torjo <john.lists_at_[hidden]> writes:
>> How about having the email' addresses of all the review managers on
>> the formal_review_process.html page? (and update this page as review
>> managers are added or deleted)
>> The one making a review request will have to write an email to all of
>> the managers, and see which one is available. I don't think there
>> would be a problem if for a review request we would have multiple
>> review managers.
Because the review manager's list is keep ordered as queue, all would not
have to be bothered. Just the one at the top of the queue.
>I think we should:
> a. Make being a review manager or a moderator or a wizard one of the
> conditions of having a library in boost
Yes, that would be helpful for sure:-)
> b. Use a regular rotating schedule for review managers. If you're
> not going to be available when your time comes up, it should be
> your responsibility to find someone to swap with.
The Review Wizard already maintains a queue of review managers, so it would
just be a matter of putting it in CVS and keeping it current.
These suggestions might markedly lessen the reliance on the Review Wizard,
and that would be a good thing, IMO.
Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk