Re: [boost] 1.31.0 Progress (or lack thereof)

From: Jeremy Siek (jsiek_at_[hidden])
Date: 2004-01-26 12:16:18

Hi Beman,

More merges checked in.

All of the iterator tests (but the expected interoperable_fail)
pass for me now on darwin gcc 3.3

On Jan 26, 2004, at 10:11 AM, Beman Dawes wrote:

> At 11:15 PM 1/25/2004, Jeremy Siek wrote:
> >
> >On Sun, 25 Jan 2004, Beman Dawes wrote:
> >bdawes> What about filter_iterator_test failing all compilers?
> >bdawes>
> >bdawes> Any ideas?
> >
> >Ok, I got that one fixed too. Needed to merge changes to
> >iterator_concepts.hpp.
>
> OK, filter_iterator_test is passing all Win32 compilers.
>
> But there are several new iterator failures. Please take a look at  
> http://boost.sourceforge.net/regression-logs/cs-win32-RC_1_31_0.html
>
> They all look like the same problem:
>
> ### mwcc Compiler: # File:  
> ..\libs\iterator\test\transform_iterator_test.cpp #  
> ---------------------------------------------------------- # 118:  
> boost::function_requires< boost_concepts::InteroperableConcept<iter_t,  
> c_iter_t> >(); # Error: ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ # undefined identifier  
> 'InteroperableConcept' ### mwcc Compiler: # 119: } # Error: ^ # ';'  
> expected
>
>
> There are also new failures in type_traits and  
> functional/function_test. That last one is in call traits, so I  
> wouldn't be surprised if it is fallout from the type traits problem.  
> John?
>
> --Beman
>
> _______________________________________________
> Unsubscribe & other changes:  
> http://lists.boost.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/boost
>
------------------------------------------------------------------------ 
-----------------
Jeremy Siek					http://php.indiana.edu/~jsiek/
  Ph.D. Student, Indiana Univ. B'ton	email: jsiek_at_[hidden]
  C++ Booster (http://www.boost.org)	office phone: [phone]
------------------------------------------------------------------------ 
-----------------