From: Robert Ramey (ramey_at_[hidden])
Date: 2004-01-26 16:00:30
Dave Abrahams wrote:
> I'm actually shocked that we're wedging
>is_abstract into the release branch.
Doesn't this kinkd explain why three months can
elapse between the time a new release is anounced
and the time it is available.?
Can't we just say that when a release is anounced any
new features will have to be added to the next release?
I believe that the efforts to get features in sooner have
actually resulted in making the new features available later.
I also believe that this is common occurance on lots of
Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk