From: Thomas Witt (witt_at_[hidden])
Date: 2004-01-28 09:47:52
Douglas Gregor wrote:
> On Tuesday 27 January 2004 01:20 am, Thomas Wenisch wrote:
> I too like the idea of seconding a formal review request, but I'd rather that
> "seconding" imply that someone has looked over the library and found that it
> is in reasonably good shape for a formal review.
> Otherwise, we'll still have
> the problem Thomas W. is describing where a formal review is requested,
> several people "second" because they are interested, but the formal review
> won't happen because the library isn't ready.
Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk