[boost] Re: [administrative] Formal Review Process

From: Thomas Witt (witt_at_[hidden])
Date: 2004-01-28 09:47:52

Douglas Gregor wrote:
> On Tuesday 27 January 2004 01:20 am, Thomas Wenisch wrote:
> 
> 
> I too like the idea of seconding a formal review request, but I'd rather that 
> "seconding" imply that someone has looked over the library and found that it 
> is in reasonably good shape for a formal review.

Agreed.

> Otherwise, we'll still have 
> the problem Thomas W. is describing where a formal review is requested, 
> several people "second" because they are interested, but the formal review 
> won't happen because the library isn't ready.
> 
> 	Doug

Thomas