Re: [boost] Re: function (object) return and argument metafunctions?

From: Peter Dimov (pdimov_at_[hidden])
Date: 2004-01-31 09:37:20

David Abrahams wrote:
> Douglas Paul Gregor <gregod_at_[hidden]> writes:
>
>> Well, we could extend function_traits a bit...
>
> Not another multi-valued traits blob, please!  I want metafunctions.
> The best answer might be a single metafunction returning an MPL
> sequence of argument types.

I've asked you before: a function type is a perfectly good sequence, why not
just extend MPL to iterate over it? (Which I recall MPL "v2" already did at
one point, to enable list(int, float, void*) to work.)