Boost logo

Boost :

From: David Abrahams (dave_at_[hidden])
Date: 2004-01-31 21:39:38

"Andy Little" <andy_at_[hidden]> writes:

>> These aren't very interesting metafunctions, since they're all
>> equivalent to mpl::always<implementation_defined> ;-)
> Oops sorry perhaps read 'undefined',' user defined' not implementation
> defined :-)

My point was to say that you are proposing we add something to the
library, but you haven't shown us anything but a sketch of a few empty
metafunctions. How can anyone comment?

> Not to stay that way just havent had time to write some simple examples.
> (pow_<int_,int_> should be easy!) Could use one of my own but doesnt mean
> much to many -->
> The problem is I have specialised plus, minus, multiplies etc. for use in
> 'expression templates'. (think is right term).
> However it would be odd to put these in separate namespace.

?? Specializations can only go in the same namespace as the primary

Dave Abrahams
Boost Consulting

Boost list run by bdawes at, gregod at, cpdaniel at, john at