[boost] Re: Re: Boost Digest, Vol 622, Issue 5

From: Michael Glassford (glassfordm_at_[hidden])
Date: 2004-02-02 08:19:44

Thanks. I would at some point still be interested in seeing the
"static mutex" you mentioned, though.

Mike

"John Maddock" <john_at_[hidden]> wrote in message
news:004301c3e810$d7ce5410$86740252_at_fuji...
> > How about using Boost.Thread's call_once function? I realize it
requires
> > extra code, but something along these lines seems like it should
both
> > avoid too much locking and still work:
> >
>
> Aha, good thinking, yes that's a good idea.
>
> John.
> _______________________________________________
> Unsubscribe & other changes:
http://lists.boost.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/boost
>