From: Beman Dawes (bdawes_at_[hidden])
Date: 2004-02-02 11:48:18
At 11:09 AM 2/2/2004, Jeremy Maitin-Shepard wrote:
>Perhaps the function could return optional<bool> or something similar.
Give the stated aim of the library to be useful for simple, script-like
programs, that seems a bit like overkill.
Also, I'm grooming this library for submission to the Standards committee.
The less dependencies on components not in the standard, the better. Of
course, boost::optional may get submitted someday too...
Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk