Boost logo

Boost :

From: Slawomir Lisznianski (slisznianski_at_[hidden])
Date: 2004-02-06 21:12:16


Boost library, in general, is often appreciated for its minimal, yet
complete and portable implementations of various concepts.
Considering that thread cancellation, along with other thread control
methods such as stop, resume, suspend etc, is either purposefully not
supported or made deprecated in other libraries, including Java threads
(forgive me for daring to leave C++ realm), wouldn't it be wise not to
include such feature at all?

Slawomir Lisznianski; [ www.rhapsodia.org ]

Michael Glassford wrote:

>"Burc Arpat" <burch_at_[hidden]> wrote in message
>news:!~!UENERkVCMDkAAQACAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAABgAAAAAAAAAuNR7Z88Qb0eVToFdSB8PXsKAAAAQAAAA/KlPjPzPXkmxgDUd2Qd6sgEAAAAA_at_stanford.edu...
>
>
>>one question, though: i understand thread cancellation is gonna be
>>
>>
>one of
>
>
>>the topics to work on. to be honest, it is gonna be quite important
>>
>>
>for us
>
>
>>in the future. do you think it will be safe to say at least an
>>
>>
>Thread cancellation in C++ is a difficult and often contentious topic,
>so I don't think it would be safe to say that. However, there is at
>least the beginning of a thread cancellation implementation in the
>thread_dev branch in CVS. I haven't looked at it yet to see how
>(in)complete it is.
>
>
>
>
>_______________________________________________
>Unsubscribe & other changes: http://lists.boost.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/boost
>
>


Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk