[boost] Re: Perfect Forwarding (almost)

From: David Abrahams (dave_at_[hidden])
Date: 2004-02-08 11:36:02

Brian McNamara <lorgon_at_[hidden]> writes:

> It is unclear to me if/how your code solves the "perfect forwarding"
> problem.  Instead it appears to show a way to make a particular type
> "movable".  Have I misunderstood?  (How) does your generalize to a way
> to write forwarding functions?

It doesn't.  I get the issues confused because we were solving them
with the same mechanism (rvalue references).  This is about move
semantics.

-- 
Dave Abrahams
Boost Consulting
www.boost-consulting.com