Boost :

Date view	Thread view	Subject view	Author view

From: David Abrahams (dave_at_[hidden])
Date: 2004-02-09 16:16:32

Next message: Brock Peabody: "RE: [boost] Re: future of boost.threads"
Previous message: David Abrahams: "[boost] Re: Perfect moving (almost)"
In reply to: David B. Held: "[boost] Re: Perfect moving (almost)"
Next in thread: Daniel Wallin: "Re: [boost] Re: Perfect moving (almost)"

"David B. Held" <dheld_at_[hidden]> writes:

> Dave A: Just out of curiosity, how many compilers like your
> technique?

Really, _really_ like it?

AFAIK just GCC 3.3.1 (since EDG errors in strict mode) but I've only
tested about 4 compilers on this.

-- 
Dave Abrahams
Boost Consulting
www.boost-consulting.com

Next message: Brock Peabody: "RE: [boost] Re: future of boost.threads"
Previous message: David Abrahams: "[boost] Re: Perfect moving (almost)"
In reply to: David B. Held: "[boost] Re: Perfect moving (almost)"
Next in thread: Daniel Wallin: "Re: [boost] Re: Perfect moving (almost)"

Date view	Thread view	Subject view	Author view

Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk