From: Peter Dimov (pdimov_at_[hidden])
Date: 2004-02-10 11:00:35
Alexander Terekhov wrote:
> Peter Dimov wrote:
>> One case where "propagating" exceptions is wrong is when the thread
>> is not supposed to be joined.
> When the thread is not supposed to be joined, then all expected
> exceptions [e.g. thread cancelation or exit] should be caught
> (but "ignored") and all unexpected exceptions should still
> terminate the entire process
Yes, that's exactly what I had in mind.
> at throw point
We can't do this from the library side.
> (that's not the way how exception specification work currently).
We can't change this from the library side either. ;-)
Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk