From: David Abrahams (dave_at_[hidden])
Date: 2004-02-11 11:22:55
Beman Dawes <bdawes_at_[hidden]> writes:
> At 08:43 AM 2/11/2004, David Abrahams wrote:
> >Douglas Paul Gregor <gregod_at_[hidden]> writes:
> >> On Tue, 10 Feb 2004, David Abrahams wrote:
> >>> We also ought to be thinking about releasing 1.31.1 ASAP.
> >> Then we need to pull together a (short!) list of the fixes we want in
> >> 1.31.1. Graph and Python fixes, as you've said. I wouldn't mind getting
> >> the /CLR workaround into Function.
> >I don't think there's a specific fix needed for Python, once the
> >graph library is fixed.
> What about the fails and missings on the Linux tests? Are those acceptable?
No, and they're very surprising to me. AFAIK those tests were all or
mostly passing when I went away for business a week ago. I did watch
my email and the Boost list, but I didn't see any alarms about
these. Did I miss something?
The regression logs don't seem to show the output for failed library
builds, which seems to be the problem behind the "missing" tests.
-- Dave Abrahams Boost Consulting www.boost-consulting.com
Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk