[boost] Re: 1.31.0 regressions

From: David Abrahams (dave_at_[hidden])
Date: 2004-02-11 11:22:55

Beman Dawes <bdawes_at_[hidden]> writes:

> At 08:43 AM 2/11/2004, David Abrahams wrote:
>  >Douglas Paul Gregor <gregod_at_[hidden]> writes:
>  >
>  >> On Tue, 10 Feb 2004, David Abrahams wrote:
>  >>> We also ought to be thinking about releasing 1.31.1 ASAP.
>  >>
>  >> Then we need to pull together a (short!) list of the fixes we want in
>  >> 1.31.1. Graph and Python fixes, as you've said. I wouldn't mind getting
>  >> the /CLR workaround into Function.
>  >
>  >I don't think there's a specific fix needed for Python, once the
>  >graph library is fixed.
>
> What about the fails and missings on the Linux tests? Are those acceptable?

No, and they're very surprising to me.  AFAIK those tests were all or
mostly passing when I went away for business a week ago.  I did watch
my email and the Boost list, but I didn't see any alarms about
these.  Did I miss something?

The regression logs don't seem to show the output for failed library
builds, which seems to be the problem behind the "missing" tests.

-- 
Dave Abrahams
Boost Consulting
www.boost-consulting.com