Re: [boost] Re: Future of Boost.Thread part II

From: John Fuller (jfuller_at_[hidden])
Date: 2004-02-11 14:19:47

both Ted Yuan's producer-consumer templates (cujjan2004)
and the synchronized template
at http://libcalc.sourceforge.net/synchronized.hpp
are nice thread-safe container implementations...

On Feb 11, 2004, at 10:33 AM, Vladimir Prus wrote:

> Michael Glassford wrote:
>
>>> I do need to set thread priorities however.
>>> This is more important to me than cancellation.
>>
>> This leads me to ask, while the interest sparked by the "Future of
>> Boost.Thread" thread is still hot: what are the most important things,
>> in your opinion, that Boost.Thread lacks?
>
> With the caveat that I do not use threads all that much, I can ask for
> - barrier (needed it recently, and besides, it's already on thread_dev
> branch).
> - thread-safe queue (no immediate need, but is likely to arise in 
> future)
>
>
> - Volodya
>
> _______________________________________________
> Unsubscribe & other changes: 
> http://lists.boost.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/boost
>