From: Hartmut Kaiser (hartmutkaiser_at_[hidden])
Date: 2004-02-12 05:39:23
Martin Wille wrote:
> > Anyhow, I think your point about multiple reporting is a
> good one. The
> > volume of tests is just too high. Fewer, more comprehensive, tests
> > would be easier to monitor.
> This could be implemented by using another build target.
> I'm under the impression that the test results aren't
> monitored by the library maintainers unless we're close to a release.
> So, it doesn't make much sense to run all the tests all the time.
What about generating an email to the maintainers of the corresponding
library, which makes sure they will know about a failed test ... :-)
Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk