RE: [boost] Re: future of boost.threads (implementation)

From: Brock Peabody (brock.peabody_at_[hidden])
Date: 2004-02-12 09:17:45

> -----Original Message-----
> From: boost-bounces_at_[hidden] [mailto:boost-bounces_at_[hidden]]
> On Behalf Of David Abrahams

> And what about the one Daniel Wallin posted, which doesn't require
> all exceptions to be registered in one big compile-time list?

I'd rather be able to put them all in a list than to have to manually
register each one.

However, given a runtime registration mechanism I guess it shouldn't be too
difficult to implement a compile to interface on top and it would probably
compile faster than a version implemented completely at compile time.

Brock