From: Brock Peabody (brock.peabody_at_[hidden])
Date: 2004-02-12 09:54:58
> -----Original Message-----
> From: boost-bounces_at_[hidden] [mailto:boost-bounces_at_[hidden]]
> On Behalf Of David Abrahams
> > I'd rather be able to put them all in a list than to have to manually
> > register each one.
> ?? it seems equivalent to me.
Maybe I'm too lazy, but
<exception1, exception2, ... >
is a little more compact than
> > However, given a runtime registration mechanism I guess it shouldn't
> > be too difficult to implement a compile to interface on top and it
> > would probably compile faster than a version implemented completely
> > at compile time.
> Yup. More importantly, it works even if different libraries register
> separate translators for exceptions in the same class hierarchy,
> without regard to registration order.
That's one thing I guess I'm missing - where would the runtime register
live? In Daniel Wallin's implementation it the register was a singleton,
but wouldn't you want a separate register for each thread/thread_group?
Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk