Re: [boost] Re: 1.31.0 regressions

From: Jeremy Siek (jsiek_at_[hidden])
Date: 2004-02-12 11:35:52

On Feb 12, 2004, at 8:30 AM, David Abrahams wrote:
> I'm really unconvinced that we need smaller tests on fewer compilers.
> Human monitoring is just too error-prone.  Why risk it?  Why not have
> comprehensive tests with automated notifications when something
> breaks?  It seems to me that less testing can only result in fewer
> things working, and coupled with human monitoring it's just going to
> make things worse, not better.
>

This sounds like the right direction to go in.

Cheers,
Jeremy

_______________________________________________
Jeremy Siek <jsiek_at_[hidden]>
http://www.osl.iu.edu/~jsiek
Ph.D. Student, Indiana University Bloomington
C++ Booster (http://www.boost.org)
Office phone: [phone]
_______________________________________________