Boost logo

Boost :

From: Jeremy Siek (jsiek_at_[hidden])
Date: 2004-02-12 11:35:52

On Feb 12, 2004, at 8:30 AM, David Abrahams wrote:
> I'm really unconvinced that we need smaller tests on fewer compilers.
> Human monitoring is just too error-prone. Why risk it? Why not have
> comprehensive tests with automated notifications when something
> breaks? It seems to me that less testing can only result in fewer
> things working, and coupled with human monitoring it's just going to
> make things worse, not better.

This sounds like the right direction to go in.


Jeremy Siek <jsiek_at_[hidden]>
Ph.D. Student, Indiana University Bloomington
C++ Booster (
Office phone: (812) 856-1820

Boost list run by bdawes at, gregod at, cpdaniel at, john at