|
|
Boost : |
From: Aleksey Gurtovoy (agurtovoy_at_[hidden])
Date: 2004-02-13 02:47:02
David Abrahams writes:
> I'm really unconvinced that we need smaller tests on fewer compilers.
> Human monitoring is just too error-prone. Why risk it? Why not have
> comprehensive tests with automated notifications when something
> breaks? It seems to me that less testing can only result in fewer
> things working, and coupled with human monitoring it's just going to
> make things worse, not better.
Agree completely.
-- Aleksey Gurtovoy MetaCommunications Engineering
Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk