Re: [boost] Odd TOC numbering in the BoostBook docs

From: Douglas Gregor (gregod_at_[hidden])
Date: 2004-02-15 17:11:09

On Sunday 15 February 2004 07:53 am, Reece Dunn wrote:
> If you look at the table of contents for the boost libraries:
>
> http://www.boost.org/regression-logs/cs-win32_metacomm/doc/html/index.html
>
> there is:
>    8. The BoostBook Documentation Format
>       Introduction
>       ...
>    I. Boost.Build v2 User Manual
>       9. How to use this document
>      10. Installation
>      ...
>
> This seems to be a bug in the DocBook numbering system given the current
> chapter, section, etc layout for the Boost docs.

More likely, it's because the BBv2 documentation is a <part> instead of a 
<chapter>, like the others. We could probably coalesce all of the library 
docs into a <part> and give BoostBook its own <part>; that would look less 
awkward.

        Doug