From: Cromwell Enage (sponage_at_[hidden])
Date: 2004-02-16 13:26:05
> On a second thought and after a bit of googling,
> don't you think that
> Propp-Wilson Cycle Popping Random Tree algorithm
> would be more efficient ?
Actually, I'm looking for more path randomness, but
competitive performance/speed is definitely a minimum
> The paper describing the article is at
> It is very well explained and
> pseudo-code is clear enough to easily implement it
I'll read up on it when I get back from the dentist.
Do you Yahoo!?
Yahoo! Finance: Get your refund fast by filing online.
Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk