Re: [boost] Re: Perfect moving (almost)

From: Peter Dimov (pdimov_at_[hidden])
Date: 2004-02-17 08:01:07

Raoul Gough wrote:
> "Peter Dimov" <pdimov_at_[hidden]> writes:
> 
>> 
>> I seem to recall attempts to strike down that second bullet of the
>> first bullet of the second bullet of 8.3.5/5 :-) and demand that the
>> reference be bound to the object represented by the rvalue. At the
>> time, this seemed a reasonable idea, but then I came up with the ROM
>> example. Maybe it's already widely known and I'm just reinventing
>> the wheel. 
> 
> BTW, what does the standard actually say about the const-ness of
> introduced temporaries?

"cv1", where "cv1 shall be 'const'".