From: Russell Hind (rhind_at_[hidden])
Date: 2004-02-17 10:02:01
Bronek Kozicki wrote:
> I like it too. And I also like that there is still support for version
> 1.6.1. . Maybe we should consider following this path, ie. create new
> releases without all these nasty workarounds, while still supporting
> older release of boost when used with old compilers ?
I was thinking the same, that maybe patches could still be applied to
the 1.30.2 (or whatever version support for older compilers is dropped)
branch (on a much lesser priority than for 1.31.0) so at some point, a
bug fix release could be shipped.
Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk