From: Roland (roland.schwarz_at_[hidden])
Date: 2004-02-19 02:47:56
On Wed, 18 Feb 2004 07:04:07 -0500 Michael Glassford <glassfordm_at_[hidden]> wrote:
> For what it's worth, I'm hoping to investigate what it would take to
> make Boost.Thread support a static library option again in the future.
> If such a thing ever happened (no promises), it would have to be a
> version in which features that require the dll are disabled.
Mike, this is a rather conservative estimate I think. As I already
have tried to show you that this can be done without any
omission of features at all. Altough at the price of the application
creating a (hidden, temporary) file on the target machine.
I am currently trying to create a local modification of the
threading library with static linkage, that has full function.
I think I should send this to the list for discussion then.
(BTW, the DLL version can be left totally unaltered.)
Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk