Re: [boost] FC++: indirect functoids

From: Peter Dimov (pdimov_at_[hidden])
Date: 2004-02-19 08:17:35

Douglas Gregor wrote:
> On Tuesday 17 February 2004 07:25 pm, Brian McNamara wrote:
>
>>  - indirect functoids are imbued with "full functoid" features
>
> Hmmm, what would this involve? I know that we would need to implement
> an operator() that supports currying and an operator[] that supports
> the Lambda stuff.

I don't agree that function<> should support currying. It can lead to silent
and hard to find bugs.