From: Beman Dawes (bdawes_at_[hidden])
Date: 2004-02-19 15:20:59
At 06:32 PM 2/18/2004, Darren Cook wrote:
>Also it seems the more
>libraries in boost the longer it takes to get a regression-passing
That, together with the download size, are issues Boost will have to solve
in order to grow. And we will solve those issues. We shouldn't start
rejecting otherwise useful libraries because of them.
> so adding it just because it is clever and well-written is not a good
>enough reason in my opinion.
Agreed, but if "useful" is added, and of course the other Boost
qualifications are met, then "clever and well-written" look pretty good.
(That's a general comment - I haven't looked at FC++ so have no opinion as
to its usefulness.)
Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk