Boost logo

Boost :

From: scott (scottw_at_[hidden])
Date: 2004-02-19 21:50:55

> [mailto:boost-bounces_at_[hidden]]On Behalf Of Matthew Vogt


only one item of feedback really. think that i follow your
machinery and can envisage the "model of execution" - its
pretty slick. its also somewhat different to the pattern :-|

so i would wonder at the use of "active object"? is your
model of execution the one that everyone is expecting of
the previously, unimplemented class?

this does seem to be a class/framework for (very convenient)
arrangement of concurrent method execution. which piece of
the ActiveObject pattern does this map to?

other than the "claiming of the name", it looks like its
got legs!

i s'pose anything declared in the private scope of "object"
is thread safe?

> // test_active_object.cpp
> --------------------------------------------------
> #include "active_object.hpp"
> using std::cin;
> using std::endl;

<big snip>

Boost list run by bdawes at, gregod at, cpdaniel at, john at