From: David Bergman (davidb_at_[hidden])
Date: 2004-02-20 16:49:38
> I must admit that I haven't used quilified names that much
> since I prefer a using namespace XXX in my .cpp files.
> However, when overloaded versions cannot co-exist (because of
> ambiguity), I kind of like the idea of aliasing.
> I think with names like
> namespace str = boost::algorithm::string; namespace cont =
> One can always find the name that seems reasonable readable
> while still reasonable short.
When I read someone's (my own or someone's else's code) I want to avoid
going back (or too - horror - remember...) namespace aliasing from the top
of the file. I.e., I want to be able to correctly read the types involved in
And, as Peter Dimov said (I think...), if you make a de facto standard of
aliasing certain namespaces, such as "filesystem" into "fs", why not
incorporate that scheme de legio...
Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk