[boost] Re: Re: algorithms namespace

From: Jonathan Turkanis (technews_at_[hidden])
Date: 2004-02-21 12:30:34

"Daniel Wallin" <dalwan01_at_[hidden]> wrote in message
news:40378F47.4090105_at_student.umu.se...
> Douglas Gregor wrote:
> > On Saturday 21 February 2004 04:59 am, Aleksey Gurtovoy wrote:
> >
> >>We can (re-)consider 'boost::meta':
> >>
> >>    meta::if_<...>
> >>    meta::find<>
> >>    meta::vector<>
> >>    meta::set<>
> >>    meta::map<>
> >>    ...
> >>
> >>
> >>Doesn't look bad at all, actually.
> >
> >
> > I'm a big fan of using "meta" instead of "mpl".
>
> FWIW, I'm not. I type it often enough to be bothered by the
> completely unnecessary extra character.

I like "meta"..

If you're bothered by the extra character, how about just "mp"? After
all, if it's part of boost, of course it must be a "library". On
second though, it must involve "programming", too, so why not just
"m"?

Jonathan