From: Aleksey Gurtovoy (agurtovoy_at_[hidden])
Date: 2004-02-23 06:59:02
Gennadiy Rozental wrote:
> > mpl::for_each<mpl::transform<s, wrap<_1> >::type>(foo());
> I saw this in mpl::for_each test.
Actually, if you do it as in the test, it's even simpler:
mpl::for_each< types,wrap<_1> >(foo());
> It may probably solve my problem. But is tyhe more generic solution?
Sorry, cannot parse this one.
> Or why doesn't for each pach mpl::identity in a first place?
Sometimes the value semantics is exactly what you want:
typedef mpl::range_c<int,0,10> numbers;
boost::bind(push_back, &v, _1)
> Or could we eliminate parameter at all and make for_each to
> work with explicit type specialization, like this:
> aux::unwrap(f, 0)::operator()<arg>();
Like the previous suggestion, it would rule out ordinary function
objects; besides, it's not portable.
-- Aleksey Gurtovoy MetaCommunications Engineering
Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk