|
Boost : |
From: David Abrahams (dave_at_[hidden])
Date: 2004-02-24 03:56:37
Beman Dawes <bdawes_at_[hidden]> writes:
> At 03:28 PM 2/18/2004, Peter Dimov wrote:
>
> >> I think it's a fuzzy line in the sand, so all I really know is
> that I do
> >> like "ref" and don't like "fs" :)
> >
> >Yes, is seems that it comes down to personal preference. Dave likes
> to say
> >filesystem, and you don't like fs...
>
> I never liked either. "filesystem" is too long and sounds
> affected. "fs" is too short and non-specific. Those names just escaped
> because nothing better surfaced.
>
> Maybe if the LWG likes the library enough to standardize it we can
> come up with a better name.
Just a thought: "files" is about the right length, and says about the
right thing. If you're not abbrev-adverse it could even stand for
"filesystem".
-- Dave Abrahams Boost Consulting www.boost-consulting.com
Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk