[boost] Re: borland workaround needed

From: Jonathan Turkanis (technews_at_[hidden])
Date: 2004-02-25 11:07:06

"Gennadiy Rozental" <gennadiy.rozental_at_[hidden]> wrote in message
news:c1hqvt$2dv$1_at_sea.gmane.org...
> > An access declaration seems to work:
> >
> >     template<class PropertyType>
> >     class readwrite_property : public class_property<PropertyType>
> >     {
> >         typedef class_property<PropertyType>        base;
> >     protected:
> >         class_property<PropertyType>::value;
> >     };
>
> And where is using?
>
> What does above statement mean?
>

It's equivalent to using class_property<PropertyType>::value (but
deprecated, see 11.3)

Borland 5.5.1 will also accept

    protected:
          base::value;

here.

Jonathan