From: Daryle Walker (darylew_at_[hidden])
Date: 2004-02-29 08:21:04
On 2/25/04 8:16 PM, "Thorsten Ottosen" <nesotto_at_[hidden]> wrote:
> "Phil Richards" <news_at_[hidden]> wrote in message
>> people would understand "io" as an abbreviation with no real potential for
>> confusion. (And if they are confused, I hate to think what they will think
>> an "iostream" is.) If the stuff ever made it into the standard, then you'd
>> get "std::io" which would make ex-C programmers happy too.
>> So, do we move filesystem to boost::io::filesystem? :-)
> Will the extra 'filesystem' namespace be necessary?
Earlier in this thread, didn't we say that a third namespace level should be
-- Daryle Walker Mac, Internet, and Video Game Junkie darylew AT hotmail DOT com
Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk