[boost] Re: BOOST_TRY like macros: time to add them?

From: Guillaume Melquiond (guillaume.melquiond_at_[hidden])
Date: 2004-03-01 07:22:17

Le lun 01/03/2004 à 12:58, Lars Gullik Bjønnes a écrit :
> Guillaume Melquiond <guillaume.melquiond_at_[hidden]> writes:
> 
> | With this new definition of the macros, it seems to me you can't use
> | multiple catch (a handler sequence). But I don't see any way to define
> | the macros such that BOOST_TRY {} BOOST_CATCH(_) {} BOOST_CATCH(_) {}
> | works as expected. Adding a BOOST_TRY_END would solve the problem. But
> | maybe someone can find a better solution without adding any macro.
> 
> Would something that resulted in:
> 
> if (true) {
> } else if (false) {
> } else if (false) {
> }

No, you get the dangling-else problem back. It's why I was suggesting a
BOOST_TRY_END to correctly close the "if" (for example, "else {}")

> work?
> 
> try {
> } catch () {
> } catch () {
> }