Re: [boost] Re: Win32 regressions

From: Guillaume Melquiond (guillaume.melquiond_at_[hidden])
Date: 2004-03-01 13:22:52

Le lun 01/03/2004 à 18:11, David Abrahams a écrit :
> Guillaume Melquiond <guillaume.melquiond_at_[hidden]> writes:
> 
> > Le lun 01/03/2004 à 16:58, Beman Dawes a écrit :
> >
> >> Looking at the results, there is lots of good news. Tests now passing, 
> >> warnings removed, etc. But there are also regressions in a number of 
> >> libraries:
> >
> >>     Interval - Borland, VC++ 6.0, and VC++ 7.0 regressions.
> >
> > I already reported these failures to the list two weeks ago so that
> > anybody interested could take a look. There were no answer so the
> > library has been marked as unusable with these compilers in the
> > status/explicit-failures-markup.xml. It doesn't appear in your
> > regression logs; but in Metacomm's summaries it appears clearly.
> >
> >> Hopefully the developers will take a look at these soon so the regressions 
> >> don't hang around until the next release.
> >
> > I don't intend to fix them. The library doesn't use any complex C++
> > construction (even Borland 5.5 is able to compile it)
> 
> Read above again.  Borland is listed as failing.

Read above again. It's Borland 5.6.4 that fails, not Borland 5.5.1
(according to Beman's and Metacomm's regression logs). So as I said,
even Borland 5.5 is able to compile it.

Regards,

Guillaume