|
|
Boost : |
From: Brian McNamara (lorgon_at_[hidden])
Date: 2004-03-01 20:28:00
On Mon, Mar 01, 2004 at 04:52:55PM -0700, Jonathan Turkanis wrote:
...
> I understand that you formulated the concept of a direct functoid
> because there is a lot that can be done in FC++ using functoids which
> are only direct, not full, so requiring full functois everywhere would
> be overspecification. However, I think for maximal reuse I would
> always want full functoids.
>
> Does this make sense?
Yes, thanks. I'll have to mull over this a bit before I can express an
opinion one way or the other.
-- -Brian McNamara (lorgon_at_[hidden])
Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk