From: David Abrahams (dave_at_[hidden])
Date: 2004-03-02 09:25:24
Michael Stevens <Michael.Stevens_at_[hidden]> writes:
>> Is is because there was a good design decision not to include them ?
>> Is it because this is a very touchy domain and poeple could not agree on
>> generic solutions ?
>> Is is just an oversight ?
> Yes, No and No.
Whether or not it's a good decision is arguable. I think there are
some very very good arguments for having generic C++ implementations
of many of these algorithms.
-- Dave Abrahams Boost Consulting www.boost-consulting.com
Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk