RE: [boost] Re: FC++ formal review

From: Rozental, Gennadiy (gennadiy.rozental_at_[hidden])
Date: 2004-03-02 12:11:46

> > I never question usefulness of function object 
> (any-morphic). What I 
> > do seek is an example of lazy list application.
> 
> Then you should say so.  "FP has no advantages" is a far cry 
> from "Lazy lists have no advantages".

I actually "cry" "FC++ has no advantages". Take lazy list out of FC++, what
we you be left with? Polymorphic function objects? I was agree from the very
beginning it should be incorporated. Maybe though not as part of FC++, but
boost::function and boost::functional

Gennadiy.