Re: [boost] Re: potential problem with indirect_iterator (GCC 3.3.2)

From: Shannon Stewman (stew_at_[hidden])
Date: 2004-03-02 19:14:07

On Tue, Mar 02, 2004 at 09:23:36AM -0500, David Abrahams wrote:

> Tom's right.  You don't have a right to expect very much from a
> default-constructed iterator.  You can't even copy it without inducing
> undefined behavior.

Thanks for clarifying this.

Best,

-- 
Shannon Stewman         | Let us walk through the waning night,
Caught in a whirlpool,  | As dawn-rays tickle our toes, the dew soothes
A quartering act:       | Our blistered soles, and damp bones stir
Solitude or society?    | As crimson cracks under the blue-grey sky.