From: Jaakko Jarvi (jajarvi_at_[hidden])
Date: 2004-03-04 09:40:39
> > Implicit templates would provide a fairly compact and
> > well defined syntax for lambdas, but the response to such implicit
> > templates in the standards committee was mild.
> That was my response too, when I first saw it. Was the response to
> using 'auto' as a return type more positive?
Yes. That's still on the agenda.
Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk