From: Beman Dawes (bdawes_at_[hidden])
Date: 2004-03-04 13:00:01
At 08:55 AM 3/4/2004, David Abrahams wrote:
>Beman Dawes <bdawes_at_[hidden]> writes:
>> At 09:57 PM 3/3/2004, Jeremy Maitin-Shepard wrote:
>> >If it is so simple that it does nothing more than can be done with
>> >simple input and output streams, then what is the point in having it
>> That's the point of the abstraction. To hide complexity ("A full-blown
>> GUI") behind an apparently simple facade ("a window stream" or "a
>> window object" or some other apparently simple abstraction).
>I'm all for simplicity, but trying to squeeze 2d graphical layout
>into a 1d stream abstraction isn't the way to get there.
What is the best abstraction? That's the question I'm concerned with.
Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk