From: Thomas Witt (witt_at_[hidden])
Date: 2004-03-09 15:59:51
Douglas Gregor wrote:
> On Monday 08 March 2004 09:13 pm, Thomas Witt wrote:
>>Douglas Paul Gregor wrote:
>>>On Sun, 7 Mar 2004, E. Gladyshev wrote:
>>>Yes, but it seems that I've omitted any way to get to the combiner.
>>>Sounds like something we should add.
> That was me, actually;
Yep. FWIW the citation structure is correct it's just that the first
line is bogus because all content you cited from E. Gladyshev had been
removed. Though I agree it's really misleading. It was an oversight.
>>The problem is that currently calling remove during a call to a slot
>>connected to the add signal of the container leads to desaster.
> This is a problem with the data structure storing the E elements, not Signals
> itself, right? Signals is designed to be resilient to this type of thing.
Yes, the problem is not a Signals problem.
> I'll check in the fix in a few hours.
-- Thomas Witt witt_at_[hidden]
Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk