From: Beman Dawes (bdawes_at_[hidden])
Date: 2004-03-11 23:07:08
At 08:08 PM 3/11/2004, Jeremy Maitin-Shepard wrote:
>I don't believe Windows supports directory hard links. I assume though
>that you were referring to ``junctions.'' AFAIK, ``junctions'' do not
>keep the directory `alive', in that I don't believe there is any
>reference counting, nor do they appear as ordinary directories. Thus,
>they are more like absolute-path symbolic links than hard links, and I
>would say therefore it makes more sense to have them be supported by a
>symbolic link facility rather than by the hard link facility.
Here is what the discussion in the Windows Platform SDK docs says:
>A junction (also called a soft link) differs from a hard link in that the
>storage objects it references are separate directories, and a junction
>link directories located on different local volumes on the same computer.
>Otherwise, junctions operate identically to hard links.
But I take "Otherwise, junctions operate identically to hard links" with a
grain of salt, and would want to confirm such an assertion by testing.
Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk