|
Boost : |
From: Andy Little (andy_at_[hidden])
Date: 2004-03-15 18:50:46
"Andy Little" <andy_at_[hidden]> wrote
> "Neal D. Becker" <ndbecker2_at_[hidden]> wrote
> > I believe some parts of pqs may be just what I need for some other
> purposes.
[snip]
>
> >particularly since it
> > appears to include std::complex.
reviewing my work for binary_operation with regard to complex. I think that
the following covers it as far as the definition goes. Not tested thoroughly
but appears to cover all including inbuilts etc... (Yes that means I can
remove a lot of unnecessary specialisations from pqs/complex.. :-) ). Should
also bring in functors as described previously
regards
Andy Little
----------------------------------
#ifndef GENERIC_COMPLEX_BINARY_OPERATION_HPP_INCLUDED
#define GENERIC_COMPLEX_BINARY_OPERATION_HPP_INCLUDED
#include "boost/pqs/meta/binary_operation.hpp"
#include <complex>
/*
specialisation of binary_operation<std::complex<T>,Op,std::complex<T> >
*/
namespace boost{namespace pqs{ namespace meta{
template<
typename Value_typeL,
template <typename> class Op,
typename Value_typeR
>
struct binary_operation<
typename std::complex<
Value_typeL
>,
Op,
typename std::complex<
Value_typeR
>
>{
typedef typename std::complex<
typename binary_operation<
Value_typeL,
Op,
Value_typeR
>::result_type
> result_type;
};
}}}//boost::pqs::meta
#endif
Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk