Re: [boost] Re: [config] Patch for Intel 8.0 + Dinkum lib

From: John Maddock (john_at_[hidden])
Date: 2004-03-18 06:26:37

> Just like you do now. Am I missing something? (With "that" I meant
> "the library"). In stdlib/dinkumware.hpp there's, for instance:
>
>
> #if defined(_CPPLIB_VER) && (_CPPLIB_VER >= 306)
>    // full dinkumware 3.06 and above
>
>    //   the library is conforming; but some features
>    //   can't be used if the compiler is (real) VC6
>    //
> #  if THIS_IS_REAL_VC6 /* defined BOOST_MSVC &&... */
> #     define BOOST_NO_STD_USE_FACET
> #     define BOOST_HAS_TWO_ARG_USE_FACET
>       ...
> #  endif
>
> #else
>
>    //  <old version: has defects, regardless of the compiler>
>
> #  define BOOST_MSVC_STD_ITERATOR 1
> #  define BOOST_NO_STD_ITERATOR
> #  define BOOST_NO_TEMPLATED_ITERATOR_CONSTRUCTORS
>    ...
>
> #endif
>
> Isn't that enough?

Sounds like it's close enough, it might fail for people with VC6 + Intel and
an updated Dinkum library, but that'll just have to be too bad, changes in
mainline cvs now.

John.