|
|
Boost : |
From: Daniel Frey (daniel.frey_at_[hidden])
Date: 2004-03-22 04:03:28
John Torjo wrote:
> totally understandable. But why the try/catch inside the macros, instead
> of inside the ::Base::Log::log function?
No particular reason. It just worked, so I guess no one here ever saw
any reason to do change it. Maybe the original design was influenced by
the existing interface of log() which accepted only one log-level, not
two. Anyway, that's easy to change and now that I think about it, it
seems to be a good idea to move the try/catch away from the macro to
prevent code bloat. Thanks for the idea :)
Regards, Daniel
-- Daniel Frey aixigo AG - financial solutions & technology Schloß-Rahe-Straße 15, 52072 Aachen, Germany fon: +49 (0)241 936737-42, fax: +49 (0)241 936737-99 eMail: daniel.frey_at_[hidden], web: http://www.aixigo.de
Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk