From: Ulrich Eckhardt (uli_at_[hidden])
Date: 2004-03-22 16:17:57
On Monday 22 March 2004 13:20, John Maddock wrote:
> there is no longer a
> debug build that doesn't use the STLPort debug mode.
Hmmm, good to know. However, I still wonder what are the reasons for that. Can
you give me a pointer to the relevant discussions (assuming they did take
place on this list)?
>> In case anyone wonders, I work in an environment where I just don't have
>> the extra time for STLport's debug mode.
> No extra time required, just define __STL_DEBUG, it's defined by default
> for Boost+STLPort because it catches coding errors that otherwise can slip
Sorry, my bad. It's the time at runtime which I don't have. Else, I do use the
mode already and find it great, but it slows down things a lot.
Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk