From: Joaquin M Lopez Munoz (joaquin_at_[hidden])
Date: 2004-03-24 05:51:50
Joerg Walter <jhr.walter <at> t-online.de> writes:
> > > (or to define the index as the
> > > set of distinct values of the related attribute(s))?
> > This would call for a new type of index, IHMO. Gotta
> > think it over.
> On a second thought: such a beast would be more of a view (losing the
> relation to indexed_set's original data) and therefore possibly out of scope
> for your library?
Maybe. Anyway, this is not going to be implemented anytime
soon (the roadmap has other top-priority tasks, most notably
serialization support and hashed indices.)
JoaquÃn M LÃ³pez MuÃ±oz
TelefÃ³nica, InvestigaciÃ³n y Desarrollo
Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk